Bare Metal vs Cloud vs VPS: Stop Comparing the Wrong Things
What’s the Actual Difference? Bare metal, cloud, and VPS are fundamentally...
Jan 20, 2026
omewhere along the way, “cloud” stopped meaning efficient and started meaning abstracted, shared, and unpredictable. So when people hear “bare metal cloud”, their first reaction is: “Well that doesn’t make sense.” It does though. You’ve just been sold bad cloud for so long that anything better sounds fake. Let’s fix that.

For years, cloud providers trained the market to believe that “cloud” automatically means:
● Shared infrastructure
● Performance variability
● Someone else sitting on your hardware
At the same time, bare metal has ALWAYS meant:
● Single-tenant, dedicated hardware
● Full control
● Predictable performance
● No noisy neighbors.
So when those two phrases get put together, people assume it’s marketing putting a spin on it.
The assumption is the problem. (You know what they say about assuming.)
Here’s the part that gets lost in most cloud conversations:
Cloud is an operating model – not a hardware type.
At its core, cloud was supposed to mean:
● API-driven provisioning
● Automation
● Fast deployment without manual ticket chains (obviously custom orders here are a bit
different)
That’s it. Nothing complex.
Cloud was never supposed to mean:
● Oversubscribed CPUs
● Random I/O bottlenecks
● Performance that changes depending on who spun something up next to you.
Cloud is about how infrastructure is consumed, not whether someone else is stealing your resources.
That single sentence explains why bare metal cloud exists.
Bare metal cloud combines single-tenant, dedicated hardware with cloud-style automation, APIs, and orchestration — without the performance penalties of shared infrastructure.
In practical terms:
● Dedicated physical servers
● Programmatic provisioning
● Custom hardware configurations (yep, built for YOUR needs)
● Predictable performance under load
● Cloud workflows without shared chaos
The control of bare metal combined with the speed of cloud. *chef’s kiss*
● “Dedicated instances” running on shared hosts
● VPS with a better landing page
● A dashboard slapped on top of oversubscribed hardware
Pssttt…Here’s a secret:
If you don’t control the hardware, it’s not bare metal – no matter what the UI looks like.
No expectations.
Hyperscale Cloud didn’t “accidentally” blur these lines. It was profitable to do so. *gasp*
● Oversubscription became normal
● Performance variability became acceptable
● SLAs protected uptime – not experience
So what did this lead to?
● More debugging than building
● Unpredictable costs
● Performance problems turned into finger-pointing exercises.
Bare metal cloud exists because people got tired of troubleshooting problems they had no ability to fix.
“But you just spent an entire blog telling us how amazing it is!”
Yes, but it isn’t for everyone – and that’s a good thing.
It makes sense for teams running:
● AI and GPU workloads
● Databases at scale
● Latency-sensitive environments
● Production systems that can’t afford surprise slowdowns
It’s not ideal for:
● Disposable dev environments
● “Click once and forget it” workloads
● Teams that value convenience over control.
Bare metal cloud only works when it’s built by people who actually understand the hardware.
At Limestone Networks
● Bare metal isn’t an add on – it’s the foundation
● Hardware is custom-built, not standardized into mediocrity
● Regions are selected for performance, not buzzwords
● Support is human, technical, and available when things matter.
Bare metal cloud fails when it’s treated like a feature.
It works when it’s the business.
Bare metal cloud isn’t a contradiction. It’s what cloud should have been before. If you need infrastructure that behaves the same today, tomorrow, and under pressure, bare metal cloud isn’t confusing.
It’s inevitable.
If you’re done tolerating performance surprises and cloud gymnastics, talk to a human who actually understands bare metal.